Meet the Press Celebrates 50th Anniversary of King's March by Slandering Conservatives

As an avid viewer of Meet the Press, every week I expect to see an unbalanced and unfair panel discussion featuring primarily hard leftist ideologues (e.g. Al Sharpton), pseudo-conservatives (e.g. David Brooks), and doctrinaire liberals posing as objective historians or journalists (e.g Doris Kearns Goodwin) coupled with David Gregory's hopelessly biased interviews, in which left-wing guests are never asked to defend some of their more extreme positions, failures, broken promises, and hateful or untrue statements.

So I wasn't shocked  to see these trends continue during this morning's broadcast. What was particularly disturbing, and what compelled me to write this blog post, was the sheer gall of David Gregory allowing his guests to spew venom with impunity.

When Rep. John Lewis--a former Civil Rights leader and current demagogue--decided that conservatives want to go back to the segregation era, citing the "take back our country" slogan as proof, Gregory said nothing of the libel.

When leftists Sharpton, Goodwin, and Sheryl WuDunn decided that all of our nation's problems are the result of the federal government NOT being sufficiently large and intrusive (!), Gregory saw no need to play devil's advocate and point out that the scope of the federal government has never been larger or that LBJ's War on Poverty, remembered so fondly by his leftist guests, was a miserable failure. At one point, he meekly noted to Democrat Cory Booker that many troubled inner cities are governed by Democrats (actually, they all are, at the local, state and federal levels) but that was the only brief moment of sanity on the program.

I always cringe when I watch Meet the Press precisely because it is so overtly biased, but today's biased show was especially painful to watch, because the tsunami of leftist talking points and the slandering of conservatives as racists, was broadcast under the guise of celebrating the anniversary of a great and seminal moment in American history: MLK's "I have a Dream" speech.    

The Truth about Rap

I wrote an article for the American Thinker arguing that gangsta rap has a disproportionately negative effect on poor urban black kids, because unlike their middle-class suburban white counterparts, they live in the environment depicted by gangsta rappers, and therefore have every opportunity to act out on lyrics that glamorize destructive or criminal behavior. Here are some relevant excerpts:

I listen to rap. I grew up listening to rap. Since I was old enough to enjoy music, rap has been one of my favorite genres. It remains so to this day. 

I'm not just talking about mainstream or party-mix rap. I am talking about hard-core rap, underground rap, and rap performed by artists that nine out of ten rap fans have never heard of. 

So given that I am a genuine rap aficionado, how can it be that I largely agree with liberals like the late anti-rap activist Delores Tucker and conservatives like Bill O'Reilly who argue that rap is a destructive influence on underprivileged black youths 

Rap music has been targeted to middle-class suburbia almost since the genre's inception. Millions of white people listen to rap, which means that characterizing rap as "black" music or music intended predominately for a black audience is inaccurate. 

Yet there is a fundamental difference between how rap -- and "gangsta" rap in particular -- resonates with suburban middle-class males (who are predominately white) and urban lower-class males (who are predominately black).

Growing up in a middle-class Boston suburb, for me the themes of violence, gang life, and drug dealing woven into the lyrics of songs by NWA, Mobb Deep, and the Wu Tang Clan were abstract and foreign. It was akin to watching a movie about a fantastical adventure, like Rambo or Indiana Jones. I did not live in an environment depicted by these rappers, and had no opportunities (and no need) to engage in the destructive behavior --robbing, selling crack cocaine, joining a gang, etc. -- that they were glorifying. 

Moreover, I grew up in a stable two-parent household, in which my parents disciplined me and regulated my behavior. If I got in trouble in school or on the playground, I would be severely reprimanded and punished. 

Conversely, a poor black male growing up in the projects is enveloped in the culture depicted in rap lyrics. It's not foreign to him; it's all around him. It's his reality.

Because it's his reality, the black male living in that environment has the opportunity at almost every step of his development to engage in the destructive behavior promoted and glorified by rappers. And because so many urban lower-class black children do not live in a stable two-parent household, in which the parent exercises appropriate discipline, they are far more likely to gravitate towards those behaviors. 

Just take a look at the devastating conditions of American ghettos -- conditions often vividly and poetically portrayed in rap. Gang violence has brought Chicago to its knees, as innocent black children are caught in the crossfire of shootouts between rival gangs on a regular basis. Citizens in these communities live in constant fear of reprisal if they talk to law enforcement, a deeply disturbing trend that gangsta rap culture helps to foster in the form of the "Stop Snitching" mantra, heard in songs and seen on t-shirts and in videos. There are countless cases of black kids being maimed or killed for refusing to join a gang, leaving a gang, or "ratting" on a gang member. 

Often, there is tremendous amount of peer pressure to emulate the dress code and lingo, if not the outright criminal behavior, of gangsta rap culture. 

This is in stark contrast to white communities. When I was a teenager, white suburban kids who emulated the dress code and lingo of black rappers were derided as "wiggers." There was peer pressure to NOT act like that. 

Only willfully dishonest race demagogues like MSNBC's Chris Hayes or Michael Erik Dyson would deny that a black male who uses the "N-word" excessively, does not speak proper English, and wears his pants well below his waist to (unwittingly) simulate prison dress code, is not at least marginally hurting his chance of thriving in our society. Common sense and empirical evidence make this painfully obvious. 

So whereas well-off suburban white kids do not have the opportunity to act out on rap lyrics, many poor urban black kids do. They are immersed in that culture. That is what makes gangsta rap music so much more toxic for disadvantaged black kids than for rich white kids: the music serves to not only depict, but also perpetuate, the violent and anti-social realities of ghetto life.

Rap music has a disproportionately negative effect on inner-city lower-class black kids because it's precisely those kids who can live out the lifestyle glorified by rap. Suburban middle-class white kids are wholly detached from that culture.The disproportionate effect is exacerbated by the lack of proper parental supervision and guidance. 

What is the solution? Reversing the disintegration of the two-parent household in black communities is certainly a good start. Going forward, it will also be critical for leaders in the black community to follow in the footsteps of Delores Tucker and to denounce the literal interpretation of rap lyrics that leads to life imitating art. 

Rap music can be poetic and full of stunningly creating word play and metaphors. But to overcome its deleterious influence on disadvantaged black youths, its degrading aspects must be seen as something approximating satire. Parents, teachers, community leaders, and indeed, rappers themselves must make it clear that it is not okay to denigrate women or sell crack cocaine. When rap's content becomes as abstract and fantastical for poor black kids as it is for rich white kids, it will cease to be a toxic influence.

Read more: 

http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/08/the_truth_about_rap_music.html#ixzz2cjOQ1RfO